No comment
-
- February
- 8
The trial of Anthony DiSimone in the 1994 slaying of Louis Balancio was the biggest case of Clement Patti’s career as a Westchester prosecutor.
But he had nothing to say about it this morning when confronted at the courthouse about a federal judge’s decision to throw out DiSimone’s conviction because prosecutors failed to turn hundreds of pages of exculpatory evidence over to the defense.
“I’m not going to talk about that case,” Patti, now in private practice, said without making any other comment.
This entry was posted
on Thursday, February 8th, 2007 at 12:14 pm by Jon Bandler.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Share and Enjoy:
|
Print
|
Email
Leave a Reply
It is a condition of your use of the comment features associated with the blogs that you do not: Use the site to post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane or indecent information of any kind, including without limitation any transmissions constituting or encouraging conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any local, state, national or international law. You alone are responsible for the material you post or send. Refer to the
Terms of Service.
Pirro’s office screwed up this case. Jeanine Pirro has to take the blame for this murdering thug being let out. I hope D.A. DiFiore’s office is going to fight to get the right to retry the case—- this time the right way!!
shall they retry the case with the actual murderer which was disclosed from all the evedence that was hidden by pirro and her lackies or keep an innocent man from being free why
doesnt anyone want to talk about what was discoved and why it would cause a federal judge to free aman because he is proven innocent.the westchester da makes a joke out of peoples lives and justice . i hope you realise how duped eveyone has been by pirro for her glory for so long.she is in the press for her many wrongdoings, how ironic